Danielle- “Your front cover is very good, I like the feature article photo it’s effective and is technical with the double image makes the picture stand out. The masthead is bold and would appeal to teenagers which are clearly your target audience. The overall background colour ties in well with your pictures and the contrast between your captions and the background text make the magazine stand out. The use of puffs is clearly shown and will draw in your target audience. Furthermore, puffs can evidently be seen as well. The main cover line however needs to be bolder and stand out as a main cover line. Overall it’s a good magazine front cover could maybe have a little more colour involved”
Ellie- “The front cover is very good, the background colour ties in well with your masthead. Your masthead is effective and bold the font is clear. I don’t like the blue text over the picture however the black and blue contrast does not look right and the blue text is hard to read in some places. However the other text conveying plugs and puffs are good and plugs and puffs can clearly be seen. A main cover line cannot be seen so is slight downfalls on your front cover. Overall it’s a good magazine with a good main article photo”
Sadie- “I like your magazine, its very well presented. And I like our masthead it stands out and reflects your magazine well. The main article photo its good with a white background anchors the text in well. Puffs and plugs are evidently shown this is good. However I feel your magazine has too much going on. But overall it is a very good front cover with a good mix of colours making the front cover stand out”
Taking these comments into account, I feel that overall my feedback is good. Any negative comments I have addressed these comments and changed what my audience believe is negative and turned into positive feedback. No further action needs to be taken, all three of my magazine productions now fully appeal to my target audience which from an encoders perspective is crucial.